| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability categorized as problematic has been discovered in Lilikoi Ceilidh 2.60. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation results in denial of service. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2000-0555. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Lilikoi Ceilidh 2.60. Affected is an unknown functionality of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. This is going to have an impact on availability. CVE summarizes:
Ceilidh allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large number of POST requests.
The bug was discovered 06/08/2000. The weakness was published 06/09/2000 by Security Team (DCIST) as not defined posting (NTBugtraq). The advisory is shared for download at archives.neohapsis.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2000-0555. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 10368 (Lilikoi Ceilidh 2.60 Multiple Vulnerabilities).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (4622), SecurityFocus (BID 1320†), OSVDB (1384†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-6704†). Similar entry is available at VDB-15651. Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/08/2000 🔍06/08/2000 🔍
06/08/2000 🔍
06/09/2000 🔍
06/09/2000 🔍
01/02/2005 🔍
06/25/2014 🔍
06/03/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comResearcher: Security Team (DCIST)
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2000-0555 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2000-0555
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-15660
X-Force: 4622
SecurityFocus: 1320 - Lilikoi Ceilidh 2.60 Multiple Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: 1384 - CVE-2000-0555 - Lilikoi - Ceilidh - Security Bypass Issue
Vulnerability Center: 6704 - DoS in Lilikoi Ceilidh 2.60 via POST Request, Medium
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/25/2014 12:01Updated: 06/03/2019 06:40
Changes: 06/25/2014 12:01 (62), 06/03/2019 06:40 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.