Microsoft Windows 95/98/NT 4.0 ARP Table authentication spoofing
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Microsoft Windows 95/98/NT 4.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component ARP Table Handler. Such manipulation leads to authentication spoofing. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2000-0612. No exploit exists. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Microsoft Windows 95/98/NT 4.0 (Operating System). It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is an unknown function of the component ARP Table Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authentication spoofing vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-290. This attack-focused weakness is caused by incorrectly implemented authentication schemes that are subject to spoofing attacks. Impacted is integrity. CVE summarizes:
Windows 95 and Windows 98 do not properly process spoofed ARP packets, which allows remote attackers to overwrite static entries in the cache table.
The issue has been introduced in 08/24/1995. The weakness was disclosed 06/29/2000 by Paul Starzetz (Website). The advisory is available at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2000-0612. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be launched remotely. No form of authentication is required for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1771 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $25k-$100k.
Upgrading to version XP or 2000 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (4828), SecurityFocus (BID 1406†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-5993†). The entries VDB-15726 and VDB-15725 are pretty similar. If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.microsoft.com/
- Product: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Authentication spoofingCWE: CWE-290 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Windows XP/2000
Timeline
08/24/1995 🔍06/29/2000 🔍
06/29/2000 🔍
06/29/2000 🔍
06/29/2000 🔍
11/24/2004 🔍
06/25/2014 🔍
06/25/2014 🔍
Sources
Vendor: microsoft.comProduct: microsoft.com
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔
Researcher: Paul Starzetz
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2000-0612 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2000-0612
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-15722
X-Force: 4828
SecurityFocus: 1406 - Microsoft Windows 9x / NT 4.0 ARP Spoofing Vulnerability
Vulnerability Center: 5993 - Microsoft Windows 95, 98, NT 4.0 Allows Spoofing via ARP Packets, Medium
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20140213
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/25/2014 14:47Changes: 06/25/2014 14:47 (63)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:95A:103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.