OpenClinic GA 5.09.02/5.89.05b Hash Password insufficiently protected credentials
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in OpenClinic GA 5.09.02/5.89.05b. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Hash Handler. This manipulation causes insufficiently protected credentials (Password). The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2020-14489. The attack can only be executed locally. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in OpenClinic GA 5.09.02/5.89.05b. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing of the component Hash Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a insufficiently protected credentials vulnerability (Password). The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-522. The product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
OpenClinic GA 5.09.02 and 5.89.05b stores passwords using inadequate hashing complexity, which may allow an attacker to recover passwords using known password cracking techniques.
The weakness was shared 07/29/2020 (Website). The advisory is shared at us-cert.cisa.gov. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2020-14489 since 06/19/2020. The exploitation appears to be difficult. An attack has to be approached locally. Required for exploitation is a single authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1552 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-158814, VDB-158815, VDB-158816 and VDB-158817 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 2.5
VulDB Temp Score: 2.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.2
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: PasswordClass: Insufficiently protected credentials / Password
CWE: CWE-522
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/19/2020 🔍07/29/2020 🔍
07/30/2020 🔍
11/06/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: us-cert.cisa.govStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2020-14489 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2020-14489
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-159109
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 07/30/2020 07:53Updated: 11/06/2020 10:36
Changes: 07/30/2020 07:53 (39), 07/30/2020 07:58 (11), 11/06/2020 10:36 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.