| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Fastream FTP++ Server 2.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. Such manipulation of the argument User leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2000-0831. No exploit exists. Restrictive firewalling should be applied.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Fastream FTP++ Server 2.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument USER with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
Buffer overflow in Fastream FTP++ 2.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary commands via a long username.
The weakness was disclosed 11/14/2000 (Website). The advisory is available at archives.neohapsis.com. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2000-0831. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be launched remotely. No form of authentication is required for exploitation. Technical details are known, but there is no available exploit.
Addressing this vulnerability is possible by firewalling .
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: FirewallStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/14/2000 🔍11/14/2000 🔍
06/27/2014 🔍
04/06/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2000-0831 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2000-0831
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-15962
Entry
Created: 06/27/2014 18:11Updated: 04/06/2019 09:17
Changes: 06/27/2014 18:11 (37), 04/06/2019 09:17 (9)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.