Ingenico Telium 2 9.32.03 TRACE Protocol Local Privilege Escalation

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.5$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Ingenico Telium 2 9.32.03. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the component TRACE Protocol Handler. Performing a manipulation results in Local Privilege Escalation. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2018-17768. The attack may be carried out on the physical device. There is not any exploit available. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Ingenico Telium 2 9.32.03. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown code block of the component TRACE Protocol Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a local privilege escalation vulnerability. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Ingenico Telium 2 POS terminals have an insecure TRACE protocol. This is fixed in Telium 2 SDK v9.32.03 patch N.

The weakness was released 09/09/2020. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2018-17768 since 09/28/2018. The exploitability is told to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

Applying the patch 9.32.03 Patch N is able to eliminate this problem.

Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-161065, VDB-161064, VDB-161063 and VDB-161060. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.8
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6

VulDB Base Score: 6.8
VulDB Temp Score: 6.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 6.8
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Local Privilege Escalation
CWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Yes
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Patch
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Patch: 9.32.03 Patch N

Timelineinfo

09/28/2018 🔍
09/09/2020 +712 days 🔍
09/10/2020 +1 days 🔍
09/10/2020 +0 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2018-17768 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-17768
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-161061
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 09/10/2020 06:53
Updated: 09/10/2020 06:58
Changes: 09/10/2020 06:53 (37), 09/10/2020 06:58 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Want to stay up to date on a daily basis?

Enable the mail alert feature now!