IgniteNet HeliOS GLinq 2.2.1 r2961 wan_type denial of service
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in IgniteNet HeliOS GLinq 2.2.1 r2961 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation of the argument wan_type as part of Parameter results in denial of service. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2020-5782. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in IgniteNet HeliOS GLinq 2.2.1 r2961. Affected is an unknown code. The manipulation of the argument wan_type as part of a Parameter leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. This is going to have an impact on availability. CVE summarizes:
In IgniteNet HeliOS GLinq v2.2.1 r2961, if a user logs in and sets the ‘wan_type’ parameter, the wan interface for the device will become unreachable, which results in a denial of service condition for devices dependent on this connection.
The weakness was disclosed 09/23/2020 (Website). The advisory is available at tenable.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2020-5782 since 01/06/2020. Technical details are known, but there is no available exploit.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-161801 and VDB-161803 are pretty similar. If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/06/2020 🔍09/23/2020 🔍
09/23/2020 🔍
09/23/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: tenable.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2020-5782 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2020-5782
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-161802
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 09/23/2020 20:56Updated: 09/23/2020 21:01
Changes: 09/23/2020 20:56 (38), 09/23/2020 21:01 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.