VDB-162269 · BID 109335 · GCVE-100-162269

Microsoft Windows OleCreateFontIndirectExt out-of-bounds ⚔ [Disputed]

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.3$5k-$25k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Microsoft Windows. This affects the function OleCreateFontIndirectExt. The manipulation leads to out-of-bounds. There is no exploit available. The existence of this vulnerability is still disputed at present.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Microsoft Windows (Operating System) (affected version not known). It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects the function OleCreateFontIndirectExt. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a out-of-bounds vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-125. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. Impacted is confidentiality.

The weakness was shared 07/22/2019 as ZDI-19-670 / ZDI-CAN-7959 via ZDI (Zero Day Initiative). The advisory is shared at zerodayinitiative.com. The public release happened without involvement of Microsoft. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/15/2020).

The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 109335†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3

VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Researcher Base Score: 5.3
Researcher Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Out-of-bounds
CWE: CWE-125 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Partially

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

07/22/2019 🔍
07/22/2019 +0 days 🔍
10/05/2020 +441 days 🔍
11/16/2020 +42 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: microsoft.com
Product: microsoft.com

Advisory: ZDI-19-670 / ZDI-CAN-7959
Status: Not defined
Disputed: 🔍

GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-162269
SecurityFocus: 109335

Entryinfo

Created: 10/05/2020 09:04
Updated: 11/16/2020 12:57
Changes: 10/05/2020 09:04 (49), 11/15/2020 10:18 (1), 11/16/2020 12:57 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Are you interested in using VulDB?

Download the whitepaper to learn more about our service!