Eclipse Vert.x up to 4.0.0.milestone5 on Windows Backslash path traversal

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
7.6$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Eclipse Vert.x on Windows. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Backslash Handler. The manipulation leads to path traversal. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2019-17640. There is no exploit available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Eclipse Vert.x on Windows. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Backslash Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-23. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize sequences such as ".." that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The weakness was shared 10/16/2020. The advisory is shared at bugs.eclipse.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2019-17640. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.

Upgrading to version 3.4.x, 3.9.4, 4.0.0.Beta1, 4.0.0.Beta2, 4.0.0.Beta3 or 4.0.0.milest eliminates this vulnerability.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.6
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.6

VulDB Base Score: 5.5
VulDB Temp Score: 5.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Path traversal
CWE: CWE-23 / CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Upgrade: Vert.x 3.4.x/3.9.4/4.0.0.Beta1/4.0.0.Beta2/4.0.0.Beta3/4.0.0.milest

Timelineinfo

10/16/2019 🔍
10/16/2020 +366 days 🔍
10/16/2020 +0 days 🔍
11/20/2020 +35 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: bugs.eclipse.org
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2019-17640 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-17640
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-162749

Entryinfo

Created: 10/16/2020 07:23
Updated: 11/20/2020 12:17
Changes: 10/16/2020 07:23 (38), 11/19/2020 08:05 (4), 11/20/2020 12:12 (3), 11/20/2020 12:17 (14)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!