Microsoft Windows 98/2000 Java Applet UDP Socket denial of service
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Microsoft Windows 98/2000 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Java Applet Handler. Performing a manipulation as part of UDP Socket results in denial of service. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2001-0324. Moreover, an exploit is present. The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Microsoft Windows 98/2000 (Operating System). This affects an unknown part of the component Java Applet Handler. The manipulation as part of a UDP Socket leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
Windows 98 and Windows 2000 Java clients allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a Java applet that opens a large number of UDP sockets, which prevents the host from establishing any additional UDP connections, and possibly causes a crash.
The issue has been introduced in 06/25/1998. The weakness was disclosed 05/03/2001 by Georgi Guninski (Website). The advisory is shared at archives.neohapsis.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2001-0324. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1043 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $25k-$100k.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (20613) and SecurityFocus (BID 2340†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.microsoft.com/
- Product: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/25/1998 🔍02/06/2001 🔍
05/03/2001 🔍
05/03/2001 🔍
07/04/2014 🔍
01/31/2025 🔍
Sources
Vendor: microsoft.comProduct: microsoft.com
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.com
Researcher: Georgi Guninski
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2001-0324 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2001-0324
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-16677
SecurityFocus: 2340 - Microsoft Windows UDP Socket DoS Vulnerability
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20140213
Entry
Created: 07/04/2014 10:55Updated: 01/31/2025 09:24
Changes: 07/04/2014 10:55 (41), 04/14/2019 17:56 (14), 01/31/2025 09:24 (27)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.