Panasonic Security System WV-S2231L 4.25 Admin Control Panel cgi-bin/set_factory denial of service
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Panasonic Security System WV-S2231L 4.25. Impacted is an unknown function of the file cgi-bin/set_factory of the component Admin Control Panel. Performing a manipulation results in denial of service. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2020-29194. The attack may be carried out on the physical device. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Panasonic Security System WV-S2231L 4.25. It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown functionality of the file cgi-bin/set_factory of the component Admin Control Panel. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. This is going to have an impact on availability.
The weakness was published 12/28/2020. It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2020-29194. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 2.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 2.1
VulDB Base Score: 2.1
VulDB Temp Score: 2.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Yes
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/28/2020 🔍12/28/2020 🔍
12/28/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2020-29194 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2020-29194
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-166875
Entry
Created: 12/28/2020 14:45Changes: 12/28/2020 14:45 (37)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.