Eclipse Californium up to 2.6.0 Certificate TLS state issue

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
3.7$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Eclipse Californium up to 2.6.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Certificate Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument TLS results in state issue. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2020-27222. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Eclipse Californium up to 2.6.0. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown code block of the component Certificate Handler. The manipulation of the argument TLS with an unknown input leads to a state issue vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-371. This is going to have an impact on availability.

The weakness was published 02/03/2021. The advisory is shared at bugs.eclipse.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2020-27222. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.7

VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: State issue
CWE: CWE-371
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

10/19/2020 🔍
02/03/2021 +107 days 🔍
02/03/2021 +0 days 🔍
02/23/2021 +20 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: bugs.eclipse.org
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2020-27222 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2020-27222
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-169125

Entryinfo

Created: 02/03/2021 19:09
Updated: 02/23/2021 09:11
Changes: 02/03/2021 19:09 (37), 02/23/2021 09:11 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you want to use VulDB in your project?

Use the official API to access entries easily!