Cisco RV160/RV160W/RV260/RV260P/RV260W Web-based Management Interface external control of assumed-immutable web parameter

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
9.4$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as very critical has been reported in Cisco RV160, RV160W, RV260, RV260P and RV260W. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Web-based Management Interface. The manipulation leads to an unknown weakness. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2021-1291. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as very critical, has been found in Cisco RV160, RV160W, RV260, RV260P and RV260W (Router Operating System). This issue affects an unknown code of the component Web-based Management Interface. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-472. The web application does not sufficiently verify inputs that are assumed to be immutable but are actually externally controllable, such as hidden form fields. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The weakness was shared 02/05/2021 as cisco-sa-rv160-260-rce-XZeFkNHf. The advisory is shared at tools.cisco.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2021-1291. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 02/24/2021).

Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.6

VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: External control of assumed-immutable web parameter
CWE: CWE-472
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

11/13/2020 🔍
02/05/2021 +84 days 🔍
02/05/2021 +0 days 🔍
02/24/2021 +19 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: cisco.com

Advisory: cisco-sa-rv160-260-rce-XZeFkNHf
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2021-1291 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2021-1291
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-169229

Entryinfo

Created: 02/05/2021 09:21
Updated: 02/24/2021 09:22
Changes: 02/05/2021 09:21 (17), 02/05/2021 09:22 (19), 02/24/2021 09:15 (5), 02/24/2021 09:22 (18)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!