FiberHome HG6245D up to RP2613 NVRAM missing encryption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in FiberHome HG6245D up to RP2613. It has been rated as problematic. This affects an unknown function of the component NVRAM. This manipulation causes missing encryption. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2021-27178. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in FiberHome HG6245D up to RP2613 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the component NVRAM. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a missing encryption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-311. The product does not encrypt sensitive or critical information before storage or transmission. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality.
The weakness was released 02/11/2021. It is possible to read the advisory at pierrekim.github.io. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2021-27178. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1600 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.9
VulDB Base Score: 2.3
VulDB Temp Score: 2.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Missing encryptionCWE: CWE-311 / CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/10/2021 🔍02/11/2021 🔍
02/11/2021 🔍
02/28/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: pierrekim.github.ioStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2021-27178 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2021-27178
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-169771
Entry
Created: 02/11/2021 12:28Updated: 02/28/2021 08:09
Changes: 02/11/2021 12:28 (36), 02/28/2021 08:05 (2), 02/28/2021 08:09 (18)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.