| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Compaq Tru64 4.0d/4.0e/4.0f/4.0g. It has been classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component msgchk. Performing a manipulation results in memory corruption. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2001-1093. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Compaq Tru64 4.0d/4.0e/4.0f/4.0g. This affects an unknown code block of the component msgchk. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Buffer overflow in msgchk in Digital UNIX 4.0G and earlier allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long command line argument.
The weakness was disclosed 09/10/2001 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2001-1093. The exploitability is told to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
A public exploit has been developed in ANSI C. The exploit is shared for download at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (7101), Exploit-DB (21105) and SecurityFocus (BID 3311†). The entry VDB-17336 is pretty similar. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Base Score: 9.3
VulDB Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/10/2001 🔍09/10/2001 🔍
09/10/2001 🔍
07/08/2014 🔍
01/09/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2001-1093 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2001-1093
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-17337
X-Force: 7101 - TRU64/DIGITAL UNIX msgchk utility buffer overflow
SecurityFocus: 3311 - Digital Unix MSGCHK Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 07/09/2014 01:32Updated: 01/09/2025 20:55
Changes: 07/09/2014 01:32 (50), 06/04/2018 08:36 (7), 01/09/2025 20:55 (21)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.