Fortinet FortiMail up to 6.x Identity-Based Encryption Service inadequate encryption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Fortinet FortiMail up to 6.x. It has been rated as problematic. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Identity-Based Encryption Service. Performing a manipulation results in inadequate encryption. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2021-26100. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Fortinet FortiMail up to 6.x. This affects an unknown function of the component Identity-Based Encryption Service. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a inadequate encryption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-326. The product stores or transmits sensitive data using an encryption scheme that is theoretically sound, but is not strong enough for the level of protection required. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality.
The weakness was disclosed 07/10/2021 as FG-IR-21-003. It is possible to read the advisory at fortiguard.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2021-26100. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1600 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
Upgrading to version 7.0.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.fortinet.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.6
VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Inadequate encryptionCWE: CWE-326 / CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: FortiMail 7.0.0
Timeline
01/25/2021 🔍07/10/2021 🔍
07/10/2021 🔍
07/11/2021 🔍
Sources
Vendor: fortinet.comAdvisory: FG-IR-21-003
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2021-26100 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2021-26100
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-178227
Entry
Created: 07/10/2021 09:16Updated: 07/11/2021 18:32
Changes: 07/10/2021 09:16 (39), 07/11/2021 18:25 (6), 07/11/2021 18:32 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.