SGI IRIX up to 6.5.10m XFS Filesystem Reorganizer privileges management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in SGI IRIX. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component XFS Filesystem Reorganizer. The manipulation leads to privileges management. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2002-0356. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in SGI IRIX (Operating System). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown code of the component XFS Filesystem Reorganizer. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Vulnerability in XFS filesystem reorganizer (fsr_xfs) in SGI IRIX 6.5.10 and earlier allows local users to gain root privileges by overwriting critical system files.
The weakness was disclosed 05/29/2002 (Website). The advisory is shared at patches.sgi.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2002-0356. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (9042) and SecurityFocus (BID 4706†). The entry VDB-18196 is pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 6.5
- 6.5.1
- 6.5.2
- 6.5.2f
- 6.5.2m
- 6.5.3
- 6.5.3f
- 6.5.3m
- 6.5.4
- 6.5.4f
- 6.5.4m
- 6.5.5
- 6.5.5f
- 6.5.5m
- 6.5.6
- 6.5.6f
- 6.5.6m
- 6.5.7
- 6.5.7f
- 6.5.7m
- 6.5.8
- 6.5.8f
- 6.5.8m
- 6.5.9
- 6.5.9f
- 6.5.9m
- 6.5.10
- 6.5.10f
- 6.5.10m
License
Support
- end of life (old version)
Website
- Vendor: http://www.sgi.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Base Score: 8.4
VulDB Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/08/2002 🔍05/29/2002 🔍
05/29/2002 🔍
07/11/2014 🔍
06/18/2024 🔍
Sources
Vendor: sgi.comAdvisory: patches.sgi.com⛔
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2002-0356 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2002-0356
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-18197
X-Force: 9042
SecurityFocus: 4706 - SGI IRIX fsr_xfs File Overwrite Vulnerability
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 07/11/2014 14:03Updated: 06/18/2024 06:32
Changes: 07/11/2014 14:03 (49), 06/07/2018 08:51 (2), 06/18/2024 06:32 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.