BAB eibPort 3.9.1 /webif/SecurityModule excessive authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in BAB eibPort 3.9.1. This impacts an unknown function of the file /webif/SecurityModule. This manipulation causes excessive authentication. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2021-28909. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in BAB eibPort 3.9.1 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the file /webif/SecurityModule. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a excessive authentication vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-307. The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame, making it more susceptible to brute force attacks. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality.
The weakness was shared 09/10/2021. The advisory is shared at psytester.github.io. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2021-28909 since 03/19/2021. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1110.001 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Excessive authenticationCWE: CWE-307 / CWE-799 / CWE-400
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/19/2021 🔍09/10/2021 🔍
09/10/2021 🔍
09/12/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: psytester.github.ioStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2021-28909 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2021-28909
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-182389
Entry
Created: 09/10/2021 08:08Updated: 09/12/2021 14:46
Changes: 09/10/2021 08:08 (54), 09/12/2021 14:43 (1), 09/12/2021 14:46 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.