Samsung NetworkPolicyManagerService prior SMR Sep-2021 Release 1 Pendingetent improper authentication

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
3.2$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Samsung NetworkPolicyManagerService. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Pendingetent Handler. The manipulation leads to improper authentication. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2021-25451. The attack can only be performed from a local environment. No exploit is available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Samsung NetworkPolicyManagerService. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Pendingetent Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. Impacted is confidentiality.

The weakness was published 09/10/2021. The advisory is shared at security.samsungmobile.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2021-25451 since 01/19/2021. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

Upgrading to version SMR Sep-2021 Release 1 eliminates this vulnerability. The upgrade is hosted for download at security.samsungmobile.com.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.2

VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 3.3
CNA Vector (Samsung Mobile): 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Improper authentication
CWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Partially

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Upgrade: NetworkPolicyManagerService SMR Sep-2021 Release 1

Timelineinfo

01/19/2021 🔍
09/10/2021 +233 days 🔍
09/10/2021 +0 days 🔍
09/12/2021 +2 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: samsung.com

Advisory: security.samsungmobile.com
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2021-25451 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2021-25451
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-182405

Entryinfo

Created: 09/10/2021 12:37
Updated: 09/12/2021 16:17
Changes: 09/10/2021 12:37 (49), 09/12/2021 16:17 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!