Pingtel xpressa 1.2.5/1.2.7.4 App Installer authentication spoofing
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Pingtel xpressa 1.2.5/1.2.7.4. It has been rated as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component App Installer. Performing a manipulation results in authentication spoofing. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2002-0671. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Pingtel xpressa 1.2.5/1.2.7.4. This affects an unknown function of the component App Installer. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authentication spoofing vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-290. This attack-focused weakness is caused by incorrectly implemented authentication schemes that are subject to spoofing attacks. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 downloads phone applications from a web site but can not verify the integrity of the applications, which could allow remote attackers to install Trojan horse applications via DNS spoofing.
The weakness was disclosed 07/23/2002 by Ofir Arkin (Website). The advisory is shared at pingtel.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2002-0671. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (9566) and SecurityFocus (BID 5224†). The entries VDB-18414, VDB-18415, VDB-18416 and VDB-18418 are pretty similar. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Authentication spoofingCWE: CWE-290 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/12/2002 🔍07/23/2002 🔍
07/23/2002 🔍
07/11/2014 🔍
06/23/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: pingtel.comResearcher: Ofir Arkin
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2002-0671 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2002-0671
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-18417
X-Force: 9566
SecurityFocus: 5224
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 07/11/2014 14:25Updated: 06/23/2024 14:46
Changes: 07/11/2014 14:25 (45), 06/07/2018 09:04 (6), 06/23/2024 14:46 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.