InHand IR615 2.3.0.r4724/2.3.0.r4870 cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in InHand IR615 2.3.0.r4724/2.3.0.r4870. It has been classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2021-38480. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in InHand IR615 2.3.0.r4724/2.3.0.r4870 and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity.
The weakness was published 10/19/2021 as icsa-21-280-05. It is possible to read the advisory at us-cert.cisa.gov. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2021-38480 since 08/10/2021. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.6
CNA Vector (ICS-CERT): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/10/2021 🔍10/19/2021 🔍
10/19/2021 🔍
10/22/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: icsa-21-280-05Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2021-38480 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2021-38480
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-184595
Entry
Created: 10/19/2021 18:14Updated: 10/22/2021 20:57
Changes: 10/19/2021 18:14 (47), 10/22/2021 20:49 (1), 10/22/2021 20:57 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.