HP Tru64 up to 5.1af su/chsh/passwd/chfn/dxchpwd/libc memory corruption

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in HP Tru64 4.0f/4.0g/5.0a/5.1/5.1af and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component su/chsh/passwd/chfn/dxchpwd/libc. Performing a manipulation results in memory corruption. This vulnerability was named CVE-2002-1616. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in HP Tru64 4.0f/4.0g/5.0a/5.1/5.1af. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the component su/chsh/passwd/chfn/dxchpwd/libc. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple buffer overflows in HP Tru64 UNIX 5.1a, 5.1, 5.0a, 4.0g, and 4.0f allow local users to gain root privileges via (1) su, (2) chsh, (3) passwd, (4) chfn, (5) dxchpwd, and (6) libc.
The weakness was presented 09/03/2002 as confirmed advisory (CERT.org). It is possible to read the advisory at kb.cert.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2002-1616 since 03/25/2005. The exploitability is told to be easy. Attacking locally is a requirement. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
A public exploit has been developed by K2 and been published before and not just after the advisory. The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 552 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $25k-$100k.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (10614), Exploit-DB (259), SecurityFocus (BID 5382†) and OSVDB (18203†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.hp.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Base Score: 9.3
VulDB Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: K2
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/26/2001 🔍01/26/2001 🔍
08/01/2002 🔍
08/01/2002 🔍
09/03/2002 🔍
03/25/2005 🔍
05/17/2005 🔍
07/22/2014 🔍
11/18/2024 🔍
Sources
Vendor: hp.comAdvisory: kb.cert.org
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2002-1616 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2002-1616
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-18483
CERT: 🔍
X-Force: 10614 - HP Tru64 UNIX /usr/bin/chfn buffer overflow
SecurityFocus: 5382 - Tru64 DXCHPWD Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
OSVDB: 18203 - HP Tru64 UNIX su Local Overflow
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 07/22/2014 20:31Updated: 11/18/2024 02:38
Changes: 07/22/2014 20:31 (52), 06/07/2018 09:07 (13), 11/18/2024 02:38 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.