| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Listar 0.126a/0.127a/0.129a and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Permission Handler. Performing a manipulation results in privileges management. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2002-0469. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Listar 0.126a/0.127a/0.129a. This affects an unknown part of the component Permission Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Ecartis (formerly Listar) 1.0.0 in snapshot 20020125 and earlier does not properly drop privileges when Ecartis is installed setuid-root, "lock-to-user" is not set, and ecartis is called by certain MTA s, which could allow local users to gain privileges.
The weakness was published 08/12/2002 by Wojciech Purczynski with isec.pl (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2002-0469. The exploitability is told to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (8444) and SecurityFocus (BID 4277†). Similar entry is available at VDB-18523. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Base Score: 8.4
VulDB Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/10/2002 🔍08/12/2002 🔍
08/12/2002 🔍
07/22/2014 🔍
06/19/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: Wojciech Purczynski
Organization: isec.pl
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2002-0469 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2002-0469
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-18525
X-Force: 8444
SecurityFocus: 4277 - Ecartis/Listar Insecure Privilege Dropping Vulnerability
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 07/22/2014 21:39Updated: 06/19/2024 10:46
Changes: 07/22/2014 21:39 (46), 06/08/2018 11:12 (5), 06/19/2024 10:46 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.