| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in EMU Webmail 5.0. This affects an unknown function of the component HTTP Host Header Handler. The manipulation leads to privileges management. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2002-0532. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in EMU Webmail 5.0. This issue affects some unknown functionality of the component HTTP Host Header Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
EMU Webmail allows local users to execute arbitrary programs via a .. (dot dot) in the HTTP Host header that points to a Trojan horse configuration file that contains a pageroot specifier that contains shell metacharacters.
The bug was discovered 04/10/2002. The weakness was disclosed 04/10/2002 by Leif Jakob as not defined posting (Bugtraq). It is possible to read the advisory at online.securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2002-0532. The exploitation is known to be easy. Attacking locally is a requirement. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are unknown but an exploit is available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1068 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
After immediately, there has been an exploit disclosed. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (8836), SecurityFocus (BID 4488†), OSVDB (5270†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-3992†). The entry VDB-18586 is pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.9
VulDB Base Score: 8.4
VulDB Temp Score: 7.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/10/2002 🔍04/10/2002 🔍
04/10/2002 🔍
04/10/2002 🔍
04/10/2002 🔍
08/12/2002 🔍
03/17/2004 🔍
04/09/2004 🔍
07/22/2014 🔍
05/20/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: online.securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: Leif Jakob
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2002-0532 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2002-0532
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-18587
X-Force: 8836
SecurityFocus: 4488 - EMUMail HTTP Host Arbitrary Config File Loading Vulnerability
OSVDB: 5270 - EMU Webmail HTTP Host Header Execute Arbitrary Program
Vulnerability Center: 3992 - EMU Webmail Allows Code Execution, Medium
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 07/22/2014 22:29Updated: 05/20/2019 15:18
Changes: 07/22/2014 22:29 (64), 05/20/2019 15:18 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.