Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R/MELSEC Q/MELSEC L denial of service
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R, MELSEC Q and MELSEC L. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in denial of service. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2021-20611. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R, MELSEC Q and MELSEC L (unknown version). This affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. This is going to have an impact on availability.
The weakness was disclosed 12/01/2021 as icsa-21-334-02. The advisory is shared at us-cert.cisa.gov. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2021-20611 since 12/17/2020. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1499 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/17/2020 🔍12/01/2021 🔍
12/01/2021 🔍
12/08/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: icsa-21-334-02Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2021-20611 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2021-20611
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-187437
Entry
Created: 12/01/2021 19:52Updated: 12/08/2021 10:11
Changes: 12/01/2021 19:52 (37), 12/08/2021 10:05 (1), 12/08/2021 10:11 (18)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.