Fortinet FortiWLM up to 8.6.2 Management Interface path traversal

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.8$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Fortinet FortiWLM up to 8.2.2/8.3.3/8.4.2/8.5.2/8.6.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Management Interface. Performing a manipulation results in path traversal. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2021-43070. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Fortinet FortiWLM up to 8.2.2/8.3.3/8.4.2/8.5.2/8.6.2. It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown processing of the component Management Interface. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-23. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize sequences such as ".." that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality.

The weakness was shared 03/03/2022 as FG-IR-21-106. The advisory is shared at fortiguard.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2021-43070 since 10/28/2021. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.8
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8

VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 5.4
CNA Vector (Fortinet, Inc.): 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Path traversal
CWE: CWE-23 / CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

10/28/2021 🔍
03/03/2022 +126 days 🔍
03/03/2022 +0 days 🔍
03/04/2022 +1 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: fortinet.com

Advisory: FG-IR-21-106
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2021-43070 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2021-43070
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-194109

Entryinfo

Created: 03/03/2022 08:11
Updated: 03/04/2022 18:04
Changes: 03/03/2022 08:11 (48), 03/04/2022 18:04 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!