Samsung Fingerprint Matching Algorithm Lockscreen excessive authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Samsung Fingerprint Matching Algorithm. It has been rated as problematic. This impacts an unknown function of the component Lockscreen. The manipulation leads to excessive authentication. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2022-25820. It is possible to launch the attack on the physical device. There is not any exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Samsung Fingerprint Matching Algorithm (version unknown) and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown function of the component Lockscreen. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a excessive authentication vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-307. The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame, making it more susceptible to brute force attacks. Impacted is confidentiality.
The weakness was released 03/11/2022. The advisory is shared at security.samsungmobile.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2022-25820 since 02/23/2022. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1110.001 for this issue.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.samsung.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.0
VulDB Base Score: 2.0
VulDB Temp Score: 1.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.2
CNA Vector (Samsung Mobile): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Excessive authenticationCWE: CWE-307 / CWE-799 / CWE-400
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Yes
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/23/2022 🔍03/11/2022 🔍
03/11/2022 🔍
03/13/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: samsung.comAdvisory: security.samsungmobile.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2022-25820 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-25820
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-194621
Entry
Created: 03/11/2022 09:11Updated: 03/13/2022 11:04
Changes: 03/11/2022 09:11 (47), 03/13/2022 11:04 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.