Canon imagePROGRAF/imageRUNNER up to 2022-03-14 TLS Certificate risky encryption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Canon imagePROGRAF and imageRUNNER up to 2022-03-14. The affected element is an unknown function of the component TLS Certificate Handler. Performing a manipulation results in risky encryption. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2022-26351. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Canon imagePROGRAF and imageRUNNER up to 2022-03-14. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown functionality of the component TLS Certificate Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a risky encryption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-327. The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality.
The weakness was disclosed 03/15/2022. The advisory is shared at fermatattack.secvuln.info. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2022-26351 since 03/02/2022. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1600 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.1
VulDB Base Score: 3.1
VulDB Temp Score: 3.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Risky encryptionCWE: CWE-327 / CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/02/2022 🔍03/15/2022 🔍
03/15/2022 🔍
03/16/2022 🔍
Sources
Advisory: fermatattack.secvuln.infoStatus: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2022-26351 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-26351
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-194937
Entry
Created: 03/15/2022 08:28Updated: 03/16/2022 20:18
Changes: 03/15/2022 08:28 (38), 03/16/2022 20:10 (1), 03/16/2022 20:18 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.