Solana rBPF up to 0.2.28 ELF Program Header integer overflow

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Solana rBPF up to 0.2.28. This impacts an unknown function of the component ELF Program Header Handler. Performing a manipulation results in integer overflow. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2022-31264. No exploit exists. You should upgrade the affected component.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Solana rBPF up to 0.2.28. It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown functionality of the component ELF Program Header Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a integer overflow vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-190. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound, when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This can introduce other weaknesses when the calculation is used for resource management or execution control. This is going to have an impact on availability.

The weakness was disclosed 05/22/2022. The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2022-31264 since 05/21/2022. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

Upgrading to version 0.2.29 eliminates this vulnerability. The upgrade is hosted for download at github.com.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

• Solana

Name

• rBPF

Version

• 0.2.0
• 0.2.1
• 0.2.2
• 0.2.3
• 0.2.4
• 0.2.5
• 0.2.6
• 0.2.7
• 0.2.8
• 0.2.9
• 0.2.10
• 0.2.11
• 0.2.12
• 0.2.13
• 0.2.14
• 0.2.15
• 0.2.16
• 0.2.17
• 0.2.18
• 0.2.19
• 0.2.20
• 0.2.21
• 0.2.22
• 0.2.23
• 0.2.24
• 0.2.25
• 0.2.26
• 0.2.27
• 0.2.28

CPE 2.3info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CPE 2.2info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion