DCTC 0.83.3 String numeric error

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
7.5$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in DCTC 0.83.3. This affects an unknown function of the component String Handler. Performing a manipulation with the input <string>$software_input_value results in numeric error. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2002-2419. There is not any exploit available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in DCTC 0.83.3. This affects some unknown processing of the component String Handler. The manipulation with the input value <string>\0 leads to a numeric error vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-189. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:

Direct connect text client (DCTC) client 0.83.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a string ending with a NULL byte character.

The weakness was released 12/31/2002 by FIRST (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2002-2419 since 11/01/2007. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (10181) and SecurityFocus (BID 5781†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.5

VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Numeric error
CWE: CWE-189
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

09/23/2002 🔍
12/31/2002 +99 days 🔍
12/31/2002 +0 days 🔍
11/01/2007 +1766 days 🔍
08/07/2014 +2471 days 🔍
07/15/2024 +3629 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔
Researcher: FIRST
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2002-2419 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2002-2419
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-20061
X-Force: 10181
SecurityFocus: 5781 - Eric Prevoteau DCTC NULL Byte Denial Of Service Vulnerability

Entryinfo

Created: 08/07/2014 14:49
Updated: 07/15/2024 01:28
Changes: 08/07/2014 14:49 (43), 06/13/2018 09:14 (9), 07/15/2024 01:28 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!