filezilla-project FileZilla Client 3.59.0 SSH/FTP missing encryption ⚔ [Disputed]

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.2$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in filezilla-project FileZilla Client 3.59.0. This affects an unknown function of the component SSH/FTP. Performing a manipulation results in missing encryption. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2022-29620. The attack must be initiated from a local position. There is no exploit available. There are still doubts about whether this vulnerability truly exists.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in filezilla-project FileZilla Client 3.59.0 (Connectivity Software). This affects an unknown code of the component SSH/FTP. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a missing encryption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-311. The product does not encrypt sensitive or critical information before storage or transmission. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality.

The weakness was shared 06/08/2022. The advisory is shared at whichbuffer.medium.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2022-29620 since 04/25/2022. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1600 for this issue.

The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

Video

Youtube: Not available anymore

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.2
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2

VulDB Base Score: 1.9
VulDB Temp Score: 1.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Missing encryption
CWE: CWE-311 / CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

04/25/2022 🔍
06/08/2022 +44 days 🔍
06/08/2022 +0 days 🔍
08/03/2024 +787 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: whichbuffer.medium.com
Status: Confirmed
Disputed: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2022-29620 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-29620
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-201429

Entryinfo

Created: 06/08/2022 08:46
Updated: 08/03/2024 11:20
Changes: 06/08/2022 08:46 (39), 06/08/2022 11:14 (2), 06/10/2022 13:52 (1), 08/03/2024 11:20 (33)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Want to know what is going to be exploited?

We predict KEV entries!