| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Rapidstream 500/2000/4000/6000/8000. This affects an unknown part of the component CLI Interface. The manipulation of the argument Password leads to format string. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2002-1519. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as very critical, has been found in Rapidstream 500/2000/4000/6000/8000. This issue affects an unknown code of the component CLI Interface. The manipulation of the argument password with an unknown input leads to a format string vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-134. The product uses a function that accepts a format string as an argument, but the format string originates from an external source. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Format string vulnerability in the CLI interface for WatchGuard Firebox Vclass 3.2 and earlier, and RSSA Appliance 3.0.2, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the password parameter.
The bug was discovered 08/22/2002. The weakness was disclosed 09/27/2002 by Joao Gouveia (Website). The advisory is shared at archives.neohapsis.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2002-1519. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 06/13/2018).
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 36 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (10217), SecurityFocus (BID 5814†) and OSVDB (4924†). The entry VDB-20298 is pretty similar. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Format stringCWE: CWE-134 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/22/2002 🔍09/27/2002 🔍
09/27/2002 🔍
04/02/2003 🔍
04/03/2004 🔍
08/08/2014 🔍
06/13/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comResearcher: Joao Gouveia
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2002-1519 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2002-1519
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-20297
X-Force: 10217
SecurityFocus: 5814 - WatchGuard Firebox VClass CLI Interface Format String Vulnerability
OSVDB: 4924 - WatchGuard FireBox Vclass/RSSA Login Format Strings
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 08/08/2014 12:28Updated: 06/13/2018 09:27
Changes: 08/08/2014 12:28 (47), 06/13/2018 09:27 (10)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.