| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Asus DSL-N14U-B1. This affects an unknown function of the component list Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability was named CVE-2022-32988. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Asus DSL-N14U-B1 (version now known). This affects some unknown processing of the component list Parameter Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in router Asus DSL-N14U-B1 1.1.2.3_805 via the "*list" parameters (e.g. filter_lwlist, keyword_rulelist, etc) in every ".asp" page containing a list of stored strings. The following asp files are affected: (1) cgi-bin/APP_Installation.asp, (2) cgi-bin/Advanced_ACL_Content.asp, (3) cgi-bin/Advanced_ADSL_Content.asp, (4) cgi-bin/Advanced_ASUSDDNS_Content.asp, (5) cgi-bin/Advanced_AiDisk_ftp.asp, (6) cgi-bin/Advanced_AiDisk_samba.asp, (7) cgi-bin/Advanced_DSL_Content.asp, (8) cgi-bin/Advanced_Firewall_Content.asp, (9) cgi-bin/Advanced_FirmwareUpgrade_Content.asp, (10) cgi-bin/Advanced_GWStaticRoute_Content.asp, (11) cgi-bin/Advanced_IPTV_Content.asp, (12) cgi-bin/Advanced_IPv6_Content.asp, (13) cgi-bin/Advanced_KeywordFilter_Content.asp, (14) cgi-bin/Advanced_LAN_Content.asp, (15) cgi-bin/Advanced_Modem_Content.asp, (16) cgi-bin/Advanced_PortTrigger_Content.asp, (17) cgi-bin/Advanced_QOSUserPrio_Content.asp, (18) cgi-bin/Advanced_QOSUserRules_Content.asp, (19) cgi-bin/Advanced_SettingBackup_Content.asp, (20) cgi-bin/Advanced_System_Content.asp, (21) cgi-bin/Advanced_URLFilter_Content.asp, (22) cgi-bin/Advanced_VPN_PPTP.asp, (23) cgi-bin/Advanced_VirtualServer_Content.asp, (24) cgi-bin/Advanced_WANPort_Content.asp, (25) cgi-bin/Advanced_WAdvanced_Content.asp, (26) cgi-bin/Advanced_WMode_Content.asp, (27) cgi-bin/Advanced_WWPS_Content.asp, (28) cgi-bin/Advanced_Wireless_Content.asp, (29) cgi-bin/Bandwidth_Limiter.asp, (30) cgi-bin/Guest_network.asp, (31) cgi-bin/Main_AccessLog_Content.asp, (32) cgi-bin/Main_AdslStatus_Content.asp, (33) cgi-bin/Main_Spectrum_Content.asp, (34) cgi-bin/Main_WebHistory_Content.asp, (35) cgi-bin/ParentalControl.asp, (36) cgi-bin/QIS_wizard.asp, (37) cgi-bin/QoS_EZQoS.asp, (38) cgi-bin/aidisk.asp, (39) cgi-bin/aidisk/Aidisk-1.asp, (40) cgi-bin/aidisk/Aidisk-2.asp, (41) cgi-bin/aidisk/Aidisk-3.asp, (42) cgi-bin/aidisk/Aidisk-4.asp, (43) cgi-bin/blocking.asp, (44) cgi-bin/cloud_main.asp, (45) cgi-bin/cloud_router_sync.asp, (46) cgi-bin/cloud_settings.asp, (47) cgi-bin/cloud_sync.asp, (48) cgi-bin/device-map/DSL_dashboard.asp, (49) cgi-bin/device-map/clients.asp, (50) cgi-bin/device-map/disk.asp, (51) cgi-bin/device-map/internet.asp, (52) cgi-bin/error_page.asp, (53) cgi-bin/index.asp, (54) cgi-bin/index2.asp, (55) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_PTM_manual_setting.asp, (56) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_admin_pass.asp, (57) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_annex_setting.asp, (58) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_bridge_cfg_tmp.asp, (59) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_detect.asp, (60) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_finish.asp, (61) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_ipoa_cfg_tmp.asp, (62) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_manual_setting.asp, (63) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_mer_cfg.asp, (64) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_mer_cfg_tmp.asp, (65) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_ppp_cfg.asp, (66) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_ppp_cfg_tmp.asp, (67) cgi-bin/qis/QIS_wireless.asp, (68) cgi-bin/query_wan_status.asp, (69) cgi-bin/query_wan_status2.asp, and (70) cgi-bin/start_apply.asp.
The weakness was presented 07/01/2022. The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2022-32988 since 06/13/2022. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.asus.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.4
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/13/2022 🔍07/01/2022 🔍
07/01/2022 🔍
07/17/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: asus.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2022-32988 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-32988
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-203013
Entry
Created: 07/01/2022 11:46Updated: 07/17/2022 09:22
Changes: 07/01/2022 11:46 (37), 07/17/2022 09:22 (18)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.