| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Xen. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Shadow Mode. The manipulation leads to an unknown weakness. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2022-33745. There is no available exploit. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Xen (Virtualization Software) (version now known) and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Shadow Mode. The impact remains unknown. The summary by CVE is:
insufficient TLB flush for x86 PV guests in shadow mode For migration as well as to work around kernels unaware of L1TF (see XSA-273), PV guests may be run in shadow paging mode. To address XSA-401, code was moved inside a function in Xen. This code movement missed a variable changing meaning / value between old and new code positions. The now wrong use of the variable did lead to a wrong TLB flush condition, omitting flushes where such are necessary.
The weakness was presented 07/26/2022. It is possible to read the advisory at xenbits.xenproject.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2022-33745 since 06/15/2022. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2022-36784). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.5
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privilege escalationCWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/15/2022 🔍07/26/2022 🔍
07/26/2022 🔍
06/11/2026 🔍
Sources
Advisory: FEDORA-2022-4f7cd241e2Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2022-33745 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-33745
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-205043
EUVD: 🔍
Entry
Created: 07/26/2022 16:38Updated: 06/11/2026 12:17
Changes: 07/26/2022 16:38 (36), 08/27/2022 09:57 (1), 06/11/2026 12:17 (15)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.