| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in yasm 1.3.0. It has been classified as problematic. This issue affects the function expand_smacro of the file modules/preprocs/nasm/nasm-pp.c. Performing a manipulation results in null pointer dereference.
This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2021-33466. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in yasm 1.3.0. This affects the function expand_smacro of the file modules/preprocs/nasm/nasm-pp.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a null pointer dereference vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-476. A NULL pointer dereference occurs when the application dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid, but is NULL, typically causing a crash or exit. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered in yasm version 1.3.0. There is a NULL pointer dereference in expand_smacro() in modules/preprocs/nasm/nasm-pp.c.
The weakness was disclosed 07/26/2022 as 172. The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2021-33466 since 05/20/2021. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
License
Website
- Product: https://github.com/yasm/yasm/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.5
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Null pointer dereferenceCWE: CWE-476 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/20/2021 🔍07/26/2022 🔍
07/26/2022 🔍
08/27/2022 🔍
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: 172
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2021-33466 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2021-33466
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-205077
Entry
Created: 07/26/2022 18:55Updated: 08/27/2022 12:37
Changes: 07/26/2022 18:55 (39), 08/27/2022 12:37 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.