| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Contract Management System 2.0. The affected element is an unknown function. This manipulation causes hard-coded password. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2022-35198. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Contract Management System 2.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a hard-coded password vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-259. The product contains a hard-coded password, which it uses for its own inbound authentication or for outbound communication to external components. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Contract Management System v2.0 contains a weak default password which gives attackers to access database connection information.
The weakness was disclosed 08/18/2022. It is possible to read the advisory at laolisafe.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2022-35198 since 07/04/2022. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1078.001 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Hard-coded passwordCWE: CWE-259 / CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/04/2022 🔍08/18/2022 🔍
08/18/2022 🔍
09/18/2022 🔍
Sources
Advisory: laolisafe.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2022-35198 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-35198
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-206707
Entry
Created: 08/18/2022 15:55Updated: 09/18/2022 08:36
Changes: 08/18/2022 15:55 (36), 09/18/2022 08:36 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.