Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS up to 9.1.0.19/9.2.1.12/9.3.0.6/9.4.0.2 CLI information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS up to 9.1.0.19/9.2.1.12/9.3.0.6/9.4.0.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the component CLI. Performing a manipulation results in information disclosure. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2022-31238. The attack must be initiated from a local position. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Dell EMC PowerScale OneFS up to 9.1.0.19/9.2.1.12/9.3.0.6/9.4.0.2. This affects an unknown functionality of the component CLI. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 9.0.0 up to and including 9.1.0.19, 9.2.1.12, 9.3.0.6, and 9.4.0.2, contain a process invoked with sensitive information vulnerability. A CLI user may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure.
The weakness was shared 08/23/2022 as dsa-2022-149. The advisory is shared at dell.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2022-31238 since 05/19/2022. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 9.1.0.0
- 9.1.0.1
- 9.1.0.2
- 9.1.0.3
- 9.1.0.4
- 9.1.0.5
- 9.1.0.6
- 9.1.0.7
- 9.1.0.8
- 9.1.0.9
- 9.1.0.10
- 9.1.0.11
- 9.1.0.12
- 9.1.0.13
- 9.1.0.14
- 9.1.0.15
- 9.1.0.16
- 9.1.0.17
- 9.1.0.18
- 9.1.0.19
- 9.2.1.0
- 9.2.1.1
- 9.2.1.2
- 9.2.1.3
- 9.2.1.4
- 9.2.1.5
- 9.2.1.6
- 9.2.1.7
- 9.2.1.8
- 9.2.1.9
- 9.2.1.10
- 9.2.1.11
- 9.2.1.12
- 9.3.0.0
- 9.3.0.1
- 9.3.0.2
- 9.3.0.3
- 9.3.0.4
- 9.3.0.5
- 9.3.0.6
- 9.4.0.0
- 9.4.0.1
- 9.4.0.2
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dellemc.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 2.5
VulDB Temp Score: 2.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.7
CNA Vector (Dell): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/19/2022 🔍08/23/2022 🔍
08/23/2022 🔍
09/24/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: dellemc.comAdvisory: dsa-2022-149
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2022-31238 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-31238
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-206949
Entry
Created: 08/23/2022 06:56Updated: 09/24/2022 12:40
Changes: 08/23/2022 06:56 (49), 09/24/2022 12:40 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.