Nissan/Kia/Hyundai Vehicle up to 2017 Remote Keyless Entry Rollback improper authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | $5k-$25k | 3.74 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as very critical was found in Nissan/Kia/Hyundai Vehicle up to 2017. This affects an unknown part of the component Remote Keyless Entry. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper authentication (Rollback). This vulnerability appears as CVE-2022-37418. The physical device can be targeted for the attack. In addition, an exploit is available. This vulnerability has a historic impact due to its background and reception.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Nissan/Kia/Hyundai Vehicle up to 2017. It has been declared as very critical. This vulnerability affects an unknown function of the component Remote Keyless Entry. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability (RollBack). The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
The Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) receiving unit on certain Nissan, Kia, and Hyundai vehicles through 2017 allows remote attackers to perform unlock operations and force a resynchronization after capturing two consecutive valid key fob signals over the radio, aka a RollBack attack. The attacker retains the ability to unlock indefinitely.
The weakness was presented 08/24/2022. The advisory is shared for download at hackaday.com. This vulnerability was named CVE-2022-37418 since 08/05/2022. Technical details are unknown but an exploit is available. The current price for an exploit might be approx. USD $5k-$25k (estimation calculated on 04/06/2026). This vulnerability has a historic impact due to its background and reception.
It is declared as proof-of-concept. As 0-day the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Additional details are provided at medium.com. VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
Video

CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Base Score: 6.4
VulDB Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.4
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: RollBackClass: Improper authentication / RollBack
CWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Yes
Local: Yes
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/05/2022 🔍08/24/2022 🔍
08/24/2022 🔍
04/06/2026 🔍
Sources
Advisory: hackaday.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2022-37418 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-37418
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-207088
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Misc.: 🔍
Entry
Created: 08/24/2022 13:07Updated: 04/06/2026 16:58
Changes: 08/24/2022 13:07 (37), 08/24/2022 13:08 (6), 09/25/2022 11:15 (9), 04/06/2026 16:58 (15)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.