| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 3.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the component ePO Agent. This manipulation causes path traversal. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2003-0610. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 3.0 (Endpoint Management Software). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the component ePO Agent. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Directory traversal vulnerability in ePO agent for McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 3.0 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a certain HTTP request.
The weakness was presented 08/27/2003 with Network Associates (Website). The advisory is shared at nai.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2003-0610 since 07/28/2003. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (12790), SecurityFocus (BID 8317†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-2689†). See VDB-20729, VDB-20730 and VDB-20778 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.mcafee.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/28/2003 🔍07/31/2003 🔍
07/31/2003 🔍
08/27/2003 🔍
08/27/2003 🔍
10/26/2003 🔍
08/14/2014 🔍
05/16/2019 🔍
Sources
Vendor: mcafee.comAdvisory: nai.com
Organization: Network Associates
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2003-0610 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2003-0610
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-20773
X-Force: 12790
SecurityFocus: 8317 - McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Agent File Disclosure Vulnerability
Vulnerability Center: 2689 - McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 3.0 File Disclosure Vulnerability in ePO Agent, Medium
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 08/15/2014 00:40Updated: 05/16/2019 11:23
Changes: 08/15/2014 00:40 (58), 05/16/2019 11:23 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.