Safe Software FME Server up to 2022.0.1.1 input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Safe Software FME Server up to 2022.0.1.1 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. Performing a manipulation results in input validation. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2022-38341. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Safe Software FME Server up to 2022.0.1.1. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Safe Software FME Server v2022.0.1.1 and below does not employ server-side validation.
The weakness was disclosed 09/19/2022. The advisory is shared at cycura.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2022-38341 since 08/15/2022. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2022-40931). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.0
VulDB Base Score: 4.7
VulDB Temp Score: 4.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 1.3
CNA Vector (MITRE): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/15/2022 🔍09/19/2022 🔍
09/19/2022 🔍
06/22/2026 🔍
Sources
Advisory: cycura.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2022-38341 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-38341
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-209037
EUVD: 🔍
Entry
Created: 09/19/2022 20:35Updated: 06/22/2026 07:45
Changes: 09/19/2022 20:35 (46), 06/22/2026 07:45 (15)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.