| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Mozilla Firefox up to 104. It has been rated as critical. Impacted is an unknown function of the component URL Parser. This manipulation causes use after free. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2022-40960. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Mozilla Firefox up to 104 (Web Browser). It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the component URL Parser. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a use after free vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-416. Referencing memory after it has been freed can cause a program to crash, use unexpected values, or execute code. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The weakness was disclosed 09/20/2022 by Armin Ebert as Bug 1787633 as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at bugzilla.mozilla.org. The advisory contains:
Concurrent use of the URL parser with non-UTF-8 data was not thread-safe. This could lead to a use-after-free causing a potentially exploitable crash.This vulnerability is known as CVE-2022-40960. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 10/13/2024).
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 208611 (CentOS 7 : firefox (RHSA-2022:6711)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading to version 105 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (208611). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.mozilla.org/
- Product: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Use after freeCWE: CWE-416 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 208611
Nessus Name: CentOS 7 : firefox (RHSA-2022:6711)
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Firefox 105
Timeline
09/19/2022 🔍09/20/2022 🔍
09/20/2022 🔍
09/29/2022 🔍
04/29/2025 🔍
Sources
Vendor: mozilla.orgProduct: mozilla.org
Advisory: Bug 1787633
Researcher: Armin Ebert
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2022-40960 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-40960
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-209797
Entry
Created: 09/29/2022 14:13Updated: 04/29/2025 15:42
Changes: 09/29/2022 14:13 (4), 09/29/2022 14:14 (14), 09/29/2022 14:17 (28), 10/25/2022 12:44 (1), 10/13/2024 13:07 (16), 04/29/2025 15:42 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.