Sensormatic Electronics C-CURE 9000 up to 2.90 response discrepancy

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Sensormatic Electronics C-CURE 9000 up to 2.90. It has been classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. Performing a manipulation results in response discrepancy. This vulnerability was named CVE-2021-36201. The attack needs to be approached within the local network. There is no available exploit. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Sensormatic Electronics C-CURE 9000 up to 2.90. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a response discrepancy vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-204. The product provides different responses to incoming requests in a way that reveals internal state information to an unauthorized actor outside of the intended control sphere. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality.

The weakness was presented 10/11/2022 as icsa-22-284-03. The advisory is shared at cisa.gov. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2021-36201. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.

Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

• Sensormatic Electronics

Name

• C-CURE 9000

Version

• 2.0
• 2.1
• 2.2
• 2.3
• 2.4
• 2.5
• 2.6
• 2.7
• 2.8
• 2.9
• 2.10
• 2.11
• 2.12
• 2.13
• 2.14
• 2.15
• 2.16
• 2.17
• 2.18
• 2.19
• 2.20
• 2.21
• 2.22
• 2.23
• 2.24
• 2.25
• 2.26
• 2.27
• 2.28
• 2.29
• 2.30
• 2.31
• 2.32
• 2.33
• 2.34
• 2.35
• 2.36
• 2.37
• 2.38
• 2.39
• 2.40
• 2.41
• 2.42
• 2.43
• 2.44
• 2.45
• 2.46
• 2.47
• 2.48
• 2.49
• 2.50
• 2.51
• 2.52
• 2.53
• 2.54
• 2.55
• 2.56
• 2.57
• 2.58
• 2.59
• 2.60
• 2.61
• 2.62
• 2.63
• 2.64
• 2.65
• 2.66
• 2.67
• 2.68
• 2.69
• 2.70
• 2.71
• 2.72
• 2.73
• 2.74
• 2.75
• 2.76
• 2.77
• 2.78
• 2.79
• 2.80
• 2.81
• 2.82
• 2.83
• 2.84
• 2.85
• 2.86
• 2.87
• 2.88
• 2.89
• 2.90

CPE 2.3info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CPE 2.2info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion