Acer Altos W2000h-W570h F4 01.03.0018 RevserveMem NVRAM denial of service
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Acer Altos W2000h-W570h F4 01.03.0018 and classified as problematic. This impacts an unknown function of the component RevserveMem. The manipulation of the argument NVRAM leads to denial of service. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2022-41415. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Acer Altos W2000h-W570h F4 01.03.0018. This issue affects an unknown part of the component RevserveMem. The manipulation of the argument NVRAM with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
Acer Altos W2000h-W570h F4 R01.03.0018 was discovered to contain a stack overflow in the RevserveMem component. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via injecting crafted shellcode into the NVRAM variable.
The weakness was released 10/19/2022. The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2022-41415 since 09/26/2022. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/26/2022 🔍10/19/2022 🔍
10/19/2022 🔍
05/08/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2022-41415 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-41415
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-211781
Entry
Created: 10/19/2022 17:35Updated: 05/08/2025 23:24
Changes: 10/19/2022 17:35 (40), 05/08/2025 23:24 (26)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.