HP Bastille B.02.00.05 on HP-UX config

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
7.2$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in HP Bastille B.02.00.05 on HP-UX. It has been classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. Performing a manipulation results in config. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2003-1362. No exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in HP Bastille B.02.00.05 on HP-UX. This affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a config vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-16. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:

Bastille B.02.00.00 of HP-UX 11.00 and 11.11 does not properly configure the (1) NOVRFY and (2) NOEXPN options in the sendmail.cf file, which could allow remote attackers to verify the existence of system users and expand defined sendmail aliases.

The weakness was published 12/31/2003 (Website). The advisory is shared at archives.neohapsis.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2003-1362 since 10/16/2007. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592.004 for this issue.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (11366) and SecurityFocus (BID 6878†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2

VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Config
CWE: CWE-16
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

02/13/2003 🔍
12/31/2003 +321 days 🔍
12/31/2003 +0 days 🔍
10/16/2007 +1385 days 🔍
08/28/2014 +2508 days 🔍
06/16/2018 +1388 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: hp.com

Advisory: archives.neohapsis.com
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2003-1362 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2003-1362
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-21285
X-Force: 11366 - HP-UX Bastille information disclosure
SecurityFocus: 6878

Entryinfo

Created: 08/28/2014 17:59
Updated: 06/16/2018 10:14
Changes: 08/28/2014 17:59 (47), 06/16/2018 10:14 (5)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?

Check our Alexa App!