Optilink OP-XT71000N mgm_config_file.asp cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Optilink OP-XT71000N. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file mgm_config_file.asp. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2020-23585. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Optilink OP-XT71000N (affected version unknown). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file mgm_config_file.asp. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A remote attacker can conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the "mgm_config_file.asp" because of which attacker can create a crafted "csrf form" which sends " malicious xml data" to "/boaform/admin/formMgmConfigUpload". the exploit allows attacker to "gain full privileges" and to "fully compromise of router & network".
The weakness was presented 11/23/2022. It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2020-23585 since 08/13/2020. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
By approaching the search of inurl:mgm_config_file.asp it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.5
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/13/2020 🔍11/23/2022 🔍
11/23/2022 🔍
04/25/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2020-23585 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2020-23585
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-214243
Entry
Created: 11/23/2022 13:07Updated: 04/25/2025 23:36
Changes: 11/23/2022 13:07 (37), 12/22/2022 13:28 (11), 04/25/2025 23:36 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.