| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Unisoc SC9863A, SC9832E, SC7731E, T610, T310, T606, T760, T610, T618, T606, T612, T616, T760, T770, T820 and S8000. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Windows Manager Service. Performing a manipulation results in authorization. This vulnerability was named CVE-2022-42778. The attack needs to be approached locally. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Unisoc SC9863A, SC9832E, SC7731E, T610, T310, T606, T760, T610, T618, T606, T612, T616, T760, T770, T820 and S8000. This affects some unknown functionality of the component Windows Manager Service. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authorization vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-862. The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
In windows manager service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to set up windows manager service with no additional execution privileges needed.
The weakness was presented 12/06/2022. It is possible to read the advisory at unisoc.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2022-42778 since 10/11/2022. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.5
VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: AuthorizationCWE: CWE-862 / CWE-863 / CWE-285
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/11/2022 🔍12/06/2022 🔍
12/06/2022 🔍
04/23/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: unisoc.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2022-42778 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-42778
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-214923
Entry
Created: 12/06/2022 14:56Updated: 04/23/2025 21:59
Changes: 12/06/2022 14:56 (36), 12/31/2022 08:58 (11), 04/23/2025 21:59 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.