| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Unisoc SC9863A, SC9832E, SC7731E, T610, T310, T606, T760, T610, T618, T606, T612, T616, T760, T770, T820 and S8005. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component WLAN Driver. The manipulation leads to denial of service. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2022-42780. The attack can only be performed from a local environment. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Unisoc SC9863A, SC9832E, SC7731E, T610, T310, T606, T760, T610, T618, T606, T612, T616, T760, T770, T820 and S8005. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component WLAN Driver. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
In wlan driver, there is a possible missing bounds check, This could lead to local denial of service in wlan services.
The weakness was published 12/06/2022. It is possible to read the advisory at unisoc.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2022-42780 since 10/11/2022. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/11/2022 🔍12/06/2022 🔍
12/06/2022 🔍
04/23/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: unisoc.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2022-42780 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-42780
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-214955
Entry
Created: 12/06/2022 15:13Updated: 04/23/2025 21:59
Changes: 12/06/2022 15:13 (37), 12/31/2022 10:54 (11), 04/23/2025 21:59 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.