Fortinet FortiSandbox/FortiDeceptor insufficient logging
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Fortinet FortiSandbox and FortiDeceptor. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in insufficient logging. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2022-30305. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Fortinet FortiSandbox and FortiDeceptor (version now known). It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a insufficient logging vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-778. When a security-critical event occurs, the product either does not record the event or omits important details about the event when logging it. This is going to have an impact on integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
An insufficient logging [CWE-778] vulnerability in FortiSandbox versions 4.0.0 to 4.0.2, 3.2.0 to 3.2.3 and 3.1.0 to 3.1.5 and FortiDeceptor versions 4.2.0, 4.1.0 through 4.1.1, 4.0.0 through 4.0.2, 3.3.0 through 3.3.3, 3.2.0 through 3.2.2,3.1.0 through 3.1.1 and 3.0.0 through 3.0.2 may allow a remote attacker to repeatedly enter incorrect credentials without causing a log entry, and with no limit on the number of failed authentication attempts.
The weakness was published 12/07/2022. The advisory is shared at fortiguard.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2022-30305 since 05/06/2022. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/01/2023). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1562.002 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.fortinet.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.8
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 3.7
CNA Vector (Fortinet, Inc.): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Insufficient loggingCWE: CWE-778
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/06/2022 🔍12/07/2022 🔍
12/07/2022 🔍
01/01/2023 🔍
Sources
Vendor: fortinet.comAdvisory: fortiguard.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2022-30305 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-30305
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-215025
Entry
Created: 12/07/2022 08:34Updated: 01/01/2023 06:39
Changes: 12/07/2022 08:34 (45), 01/01/2023 06:39 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.