Snipe-IT up to 6.0.14 /password/reset response discrepancy
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Snipe-IT up to 6.0.14. This affects an unknown function of the file /password/reset. This manipulation causes response discrepancy. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2022-44381. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Snipe-IT up to 6.0.14. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /password/reset. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a response discrepancy vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-204. The product provides different responses to incoming requests in a way that reveals internal state information to an unauthorized actor outside of the intended control sphere. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Snipe-IT through 6.0.14 allows attackers to check whether a user account exists because of response variations in a /password/reset request.
The weakness was presented 12/25/2022. It is possible to read the advisory at census-labs.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2022-44381 since 10/30/2022. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1592 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.3
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Response discrepancyCWE: CWE-204 / CWE-203 / CWE-200
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/30/2022 🔍12/25/2022 🔍
12/25/2022 🔍
01/24/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: census-labs.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2022-44381 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-44381
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-216763
Entry
Created: 12/25/2022 10:54Updated: 01/24/2023 09:16
Changes: 12/25/2022 10:54 (14), 12/25/2022 10:55 (22), 01/24/2023 09:16 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.