SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform CMC Application Crystal Reports cross site scripting

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform CMC Application 420/430. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Crystal Reports. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2023-0018. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform CMC Application 420/430 (Business Process Management Software) and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing of the component Crystal Reports. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Due to improper input sanitization of user-controlled input in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform CMC application - versions 420, and 430, an attacker with basic user-level privileges can modify/upload crystal reports containing a malicious payload. Once these reports are viewable, anyone who opens those reports would be susceptible to stored XSS attacks. As a result of the attack, information maintained in the victim's web browser can be read, modified, and sent to the attacker.
The weakness was released 01/10/2023. The advisory is shared at launchpad.support.sap.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2023-0018 since 12/20/2022. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.sap.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.7
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 10.0
CNA Vector (SAP SE): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/20/2022 🔍01/10/2023 🔍
01/10/2023 🔍
01/30/2023 🔍
Sources
Vendor: sap.comAdvisory: launchpad.support.sap.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2023-0018 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-0018
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-217741
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20150716
Entry
Created: 01/10/2023 08:50Updated: 01/30/2023 17:39
Changes: 01/10/2023 08:50 (50), 01/30/2023 17:39 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.