SAUTER Controls Nova 200/Nova 220/BACnetstac missing authentication

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
9.5$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in SAUTER Controls Nova 200, Nova 220 and BACnetstac. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to missing authentication. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2023-0052. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in SAUTER Controls Nova 200, Nova 220 and BACnetstac (the affected version is unknown). It has been rated as very critical. This issue affects an unknown code. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a missing authentication vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-306. The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

The weakness was published 01/13/2023 as icsa-23-012-05. The advisory is shared at cisa.gov. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2023-0052. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 02/05/2023).

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Support

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.5
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.5

VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 9.8
CNA Vector (ICS-CERT): 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Missing authentication
CWE: CWE-306 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

01/04/2023 🔍
01/13/2023 +9 days 🔍
01/13/2023 +0 days 🔍
02/05/2023 +23 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: icsa-23-012-05
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2023-0052 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-0052
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-218285

Entryinfo

Created: 01/13/2023 10:56
Updated: 02/05/2023 20:43
Changes: 01/13/2023 10:56 (36), 02/05/2023 20:29 (2), 02/05/2023 20:36 (21), 02/05/2023 20:43 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!